Car wash · Express tunnel, flex-serve, full-service · SBA 7(a) and 504
Car Wash Feasibility Study Consultants for SBA 7(a) and 504 Loans
SBA Feasibility Study LLC is an independent car wash feasibility study consultant to SBA 7(a) lenders, 504 Certified Development Companies and their borrowers. Each study answers the question a credit committee must resolve: can this wash, at this site, in this trade area, build and hold the membership base and retail volume needed to service the proposed debt at the coverage the lender and SBA require? The answer is built from four pieces of evidence:
- a named competitive and pipeline census;
- site-specific retail capture;
- a cohort-level membership model calibrated to current industry churn and conversion;
- a monthly ramp tested against SOP 50 10 8.1.
It is benchmarked against the firm’s own analysis of 4,863 SBA car wash loans.
By David Jones, MAI, CCIM, Principal · Last reviewed October 26, 2026 · SBA data as of March 31, 2026
4,300+
feasibility studies by the principal
534 lenders · 107 CDCs
have accepted the firm’s studies
4,863
SBA car wash loans analyzed
5.4% vs 7.3%
seasoned car wash vs all-industry adverse resolution
SOP 50 10 8.1
in force since October 1, 2026
On this page
- What a consultant does
- SBA Car Wash Lending Ledger
- When a lender orders a study
- How to choose a consultant
- Who prepares your study
- Car wash engagement record
- What the study analyzes
- 2026 market evidence
- Study vs market study vs appraisal
- Eligibility and structure checklist
- Process, fee and timeline
- FAQ
- Related resources
- How this page is verified
What a car wash feasibility study consultant does for an SBA loan
A car wash feasibility study consultant tests, independently of the borrower, whether a proposed or acquired car wash can generate the wash volume, membership revenue and net operating income required to service the proposed SBA debt. The study:
- defines the trade area and inventories every competing wash and permitted project by name;
- derives retail capture from traffic, access, visibility and stacking at the specific site;
- models membership as cohorts of gross additions, voluntary churn, payment-failure churn and price;
- builds operating costs for chemicals, utilities, water, labor and equipment replacement;
- reports debt service coverage month by month through the ramp and year by year under stress.
It closes with a determination addressed to the lender.
The determination
Feasible
The project meets the lender and program coverage standard in the base case and remains serviceable under the stated downside.
The determination
Feasible subject to stated conditions
The credit works only if named conditions hold, such as a funded interest reserve, presale membership targets, a smaller loan or a verified equipment budget.
The determination
Not feasible as proposed
The evidence does not support the debt. The study states what would have to change.
SBA car wash loan performance: the SBA Car Wash Lending Ledger
SBA does not publish loan performance by industry. The firm computes it from SBA’s loan-level FOIA files and publishes the results, so a credit reviewer can test a car wash file against the record of its class.
Exhibit 1
SBA Car Wash Lending Ledger, FY2010–FY2026
Seasoned SBA car wash loans reached adverse resolution at 5.4 percent, about a quarter below the 7.3 percent all-industry rate. Mature 7(a) car wash cohorts charged off at 4.56 percent, against a 6.44 percent program average.
4,863
car wash loans, FY2010–FY2026
$5.74B
approved, FY2010–FY2026
$1.2M
average loan
74.8%
7(a) share of count
568
approved since FY2024
| Metric | Value | Cohort or period |
|---|---|---|
| Car wash loans disbursed | 4,863 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Approved volume | 5.74 USD billions | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Average loan size | 1.2 USD millions | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Program share, 7(a) | 74.8 percent of count | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Program share, 504 | 25.2 percent of count | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Car wash loans approved since FY2024 | 568 loans | FY2024–FY2026 |
| Seasoned cohort size | 3,682 loans | Approvals FY2010–FY2021 |
| Seasoned adverse-resolution rate, car washes | 5.4 percent | Approvals FY2010–FY2021 |
| Seasoned adverse-resolution rate, all industries | 7.3 percent | Approvals FY2010–FY2021 |
| Car wash rate relative to all industries | about one-quarter lower | Approvals FY2010–FY2021 |
| Charge-off rate, mature 7(a) car wash cohorts | 4.56 percent by count | Mature 7(a) cohorts |
| Charge-off rate, 7(a) program average | 6.44 percent by count | Mature 7(a) cohorts |
| Car wash loans, California | 649 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Car wash loans, Texas | 612 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Car wash loans, Florida | 364 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Car wash loans, Georgia | 293 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Car wash loans, Ohio | 218 loans | FY2010–FY2026 |
| Top five states, combined | 2,136 (43.9%) loans (share of national) | FY2010–FY2026 |
| SBA loan records analyzed | 1,036,077 records (919,732 7(a) + 116,345 504) | FY2010–FY2026 |
Five states account for 43.9 percent of SBA car wash loans.
| State | Loans |
|---|---|
| California | 649 |
| Texas | 612 |
| Florida | 364 |
| Georgia | 293 |
| Ohio | 218 |
Disbursed loans only. Adverse resolution means purchased by SBA, liquidated or charged off. Seasoned means approved FY2010–FY2021, allowing at least four years of performance. The charge-off rate is by count on mature 7(a) cohorts. Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan-level data as of March 31, 2026; firm analysis. Full data methodology
Exhibit 1B
Car washes against the other special-purpose classes
Car washes remain below the SBA average, but they carry the highest loss rates of the three special-purpose classes the firm tracks. The seasoned adverse-resolution rate is 5.4 percent, against 4.4 percent for hotels and 3.4 percent for gas stations, and the 7(a) charge-off rate is more than double the hotel rate. A car wash file earns less benefit of the doubt than a hotel or fuel file.
| Class | Loans FY2010–FY2026 | Average loan | Seasoned adverse resolution | Mature 7(a) charge-off by count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Car washes | 4,863 | $1.2M | 5.4% | 4.56% |
| Hotels | 17,815 | $2.0M | 4.4% | 2.10% |
| Gas stations | 10,333 | $1.1M | 3.4% | 2.78% |
| All industries / 7(a) program | — | — | 7.3% | 6.44% |
What the record does and does not say
A class-level loss rate below the SBA average is a reason a well-built car wash file can be approved, not evidence that a given wash will perform. The seasoned cohort is weighted toward the years before the express construction peak and before the 2026 slowdown in membership growth, so it describes a different market from the one a 2026 file enters. The study is where the specific trade area, site and capital structure decide the credit. Compare car washes with other property types in the SBA 7(a) charge-off rates by industry and the SBA Feasibility Risk Meter.
Cite as: SBA Feasibility Study LLC, SBA Car Wash Lending Ledger, FY2010–FY2026 (SBA 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan-level data as of March 31, 2026). Licensed CC BY 4.0.
When an SBA lender orders a car wash feasibility study
No SBA rule makes a feasibility study mandatory for a car wash loan. 13 CFR 120.160(b) provides only that “SBA may require professional appraisals of the applicant’s and principals’ assets, a survey, or a feasibility study.” The decision rests with SBA, the 7(a) lender or the CDC. In practice, lenders and CDCs order a study in four situations. See also when SBA requires a feasibility study.
1. Ground-up express tunnels
There is no operating history, the membership base does not yet exist, and the property is special-purpose.
2. Saturated or contested trade areas
Competing tunnels are open, under construction or permitted nearby, or the municipality has paused or restricted new washes (see Exhibit 5).
3. Credits that rest on projections
Expansions, format conversions and repositionings, where future cash flow carries the loan rather than trailing cash flow.
4. Acquisitions tested under SOP 50 10 8.1
Initial acquisitions and owner buyouts must show 1.25x coverage on historical earnings, not projections. The study reconciles the record that the test relies on and sizes the loan the history supports. See acquisition vs start-up studies.
Exhibit 2
Change-of-ownership tests under SOP 50 10 8.1 (Appendix 15), applied to car wash acquisitions
For a car wash acquisition under SOP 50 10 8.1, the seller’s history carries the coverage test, and the 10 percent injection on an initial acquisition cannot be reduced.
| Transaction category | Coverage test | Equity injection | Quality-of-earnings report | Independent business valuation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Acquisition | 1.25x on historical earnings | 10%; cannot be reduced | Required at a purchase price of $3M or more | Required; ordered by and prepared for the lender |
| Owner Buyout | 1.25x on historical earnings | Waivable | Exempt | Required |
| Business Expansion | 1.15x; requires the same 4-digit NAICS group and two full fiscal years under current ownership | Waivable | Required at $3M or more | Required |
| ESOP / Cooperative | Per Appendix 15 | Per Appendix 15 | Exempt | Per Appendix 15 |
- Seller standby debt, other standby debt and outside investor equity combined cannot exceed 50 percent of the required injection.
- Standby notes remain on full standby for the life of the 7(a) loan.
- The QoE threshold is reported as measured before injection and seller financing, excluding owner-occupied real estate.
- A carve-out for business valuations on transactions of $350,000 or less is reported under the September 25, 2026 technical updates.
- Confirm all terms against the SOP version that governs the loan number.
SOP 50 10 8.1 applies to loans receiving an SBA loan number on or after October 1, 2026. Loans numbered on or before September 30, 2026 remain under SOP 50 10 8. A study scoped under the prior version should be re-tested against the version that governs its loan number. The full rule set is summarized on the SOP 50 10 8.1 page, with equity sources in SBA equity injection sources and the acquisition record in SBA acquisition loan default analysis.
On a car wash acquisition, the study’s work is to prove the record. It:
- reconciles point-of-sale and membership-platform data to tax returns;
- separates membership revenue from retail;
- tests whether recent membership growth came from new members or from price increases;
- measures churn and tenure in the seller’s own data;
- prices the equipment replacement the buyer will inherit;
- identifies the loan amount the history supports.
A wash whose membership revenue grew mostly through price is a different credit from one that added members.
How to choose a car wash feasibility study consultant
A lender reads a car wash feasibility study to decide whether it can rely on it. Seven tests separate a study that survives credit committee and SBA review from one that comes back with questions. They apply to any consultant, including this firm. The general version is set out in how to evaluate a feasibility study.
1. Membership modelled as cohorts, not a penetration target
Gross additions, voluntary churn, payment-failure churn, price and wash frequency are projected separately and calibrated to published industry data.
2. A named competitive and pipeline census
Every operating wash, every project under construction and every permit or moratorium in the trade area is listed by name and format.
3. Retail capture derived from the site
Capture is built from traffic counts, turning movements, visibility, stacking and competing washes, not from a flat percentage of passing traffic.
4. Coverage reported through the ramp
DSCR is shown by year from opening, and the study identifies the month in which run-rate coverage clears the lender’s standard. Churn, conversion, price, retail volume and labor are stressed alone and in combination.
5. Current SBA rule fluency
The study applies the SOP version governing the loan number, the 8.1 acquisition tests, special-purpose equity, and the environmental starting point when fuel or service bays are present.
6. Independence and a named signatory
The study is addressed to the lender as intended user, the fee is fixed, and one accountable professional signs, with the analyst and reviewer named.
7. Reconciliation with the appraisal, and willingness to say no
Stabilized income is presented so that the going-concern appraiser can allocate it among land, building, equipment and intangibles. The published record includes findings of not feasible, or feasible only with conditions.
| Questions to ask before you sign an engagement letter | How this firm answers |
|---|---|
| Who signs the study, and how many car wash studies has that person completed? | David Jones, MAI, CCIM, who has completed more than 4,300 feasibility studies. |
| How will membership be modelled, and which churn and conversion data will calibrate it? | As cohorts of gross additions, voluntary churn and payment-failure churn, calibrated to the latest published industry data and to the seller’s platform data on acquisitions. |
| Will the census include permits, projects under construction and municipal moratoria? | Yes, by name. |
| Which SOP version will the study be tested against? | The version governing the loan number. Studies scoped before October 1, 2026 are re-tested. |
| Will DSCR be shown by year through the ramp, with combined stress cases? | Yes. |
| What happens if the lender or SBA returns questions after delivery? | The firm supports the file through lender acceptance. |
Written proposal and firm fixed fee within one business day.
Request a fixed-fee quoteWho prepares your car wash feasibility study
Every car wash study issued by SBA Feasibility Study LLC is authored and signed by David Jones, MAI, CCIM, principal of the firm. Mr. Jones has completed more than 4,300 feasibility studies over his career, across car washes, fuel and convenience, hotels, self-storage, RV parks, multifamily and healthcare. The firm’s studies have been accepted by 534 SBA 7(a) lenders and 107 Certified Development Companies. The analyst and reviewer on each engagement are named in the report. The firm does not white-label its conclusions under another letterhead, and it does not issue unsigned drafts that later become the basis for a credit decision.
Consultant profile and methodology · SBA feasibility methodology · Sample report contents
Car wash engagement record
Determinations are the firm’s independent findings. Credit and eligibility decisions rest with the lender, the CDC and SBA.
Express tunnel car wash
- Location
- Round Rock, TX
- Program
- SBA 504
- Loan size band
- About $5.2 million
What a car wash feasibility study consultant analyzes
Format comparison: firm planning ranges by format
Car washes are treated as special purpose properties under SBA lending rules. Tunnel conveyors, chemical delivery systems, water reclamation equipment, vacuum islands, and specialized drainage and water treatment all limit conversion to other commercial uses. SBA SOP 50 10 8.1 governs loans that receive an SBA loan number on or after October 1, 2026 (Information Notice 5000-882227, September 25, 2026). No SBA rule requires a feasibility study on every car wash loan: under 13 CFR 120.160(b), SBA may require one, and lenders and CDCs commonly order one where market saturation, a highly specialized property or an unproven concept is present. Before interest rates rose, new conveyor sites opened at a pace of at least 800 a year; industry estimates put 2024 at 600 to 700, and equipment makers expect 2026 tunnel production to fall a further mid-single digits (Professional Carwashing & Detailing). Zips Car Wash filed Chapter 11 on February 5, 2025 with about 260 locations, sought to close 41 of them, and emerged on April 30, 2025 owned by its lenders with about 230. On May 19, 2026, Leonard Green & Partners completed its take-private of Mister Car Wash at $7.00 per share, a $3.1 billion enterprise value.
| Dimension | Express Exterior Tunnel | Flex-Serve | Full-Service |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical build cost | $3M to $7M+ (land + construction; land alone often $0.5M to $2M) | $4M to $7M | $2M to $5M (often conversions) |
| Throughput capacity | Up to about 140 to 150 cars/hour rated (120 to 130 ft tunnel) | 60 to 100 cars/hour | 15 to 30 cars/hour |
| Labor model | About 3 per shift (manager plus two attendants); labor roughly 20% to 25% of sales | 8 to 15 per shift | 15 to 30 per shift |
| Revenue per car | $10 to $20 (wash only) | $15 to $35 (wash + interior options) | $25 to $60 (full detail) |
| Membership model | Primary revenue driver (about 71% of same-store revenue industry-wide (Rinsed, Q3 2026); 79% of wash sales at Mister Car Wash in Q4 2025 and 76% in Q1 2026) | Growing (30-50% of revenue) | Limited applicability |
| Gross margin | 75% to 85% | 55% to 70% | 40% to 55% |
| Key risk factor | Oversaturation from rapid express expansion | Labor availability and cost | Labor cost and throughput constraints |
| SBA loan range | $2M to $5M | $3M to $5M+ | $1M to $3M |
Planning ranges are the firm’s starting points, not published benchmarks. Each study replaces them with site and market evidence.
The express exterior tunnel model dominates new development. Express builds account for the large majority of new conveyor construction, driven by higher throughput, lower labor dependency and the membership revenue model. This concentration means the feasibility study must evaluate competitive saturation specifically within the express segment, not car washes in general.
Wash count projections
Wash count is the fundamental volume metric for car wash feasibility, analogous to fuel gallons for a gas station or occupied room nights for a hotel. The projection must account for both drive-by traffic capture and membership-driven repeat visits. Many sites pair a wash with fuel, so we cross-check against our US gas station market report and the Buda fuel station and c-store case study.
Traffic-based baseline. We start with the average daily traffic count (ADT) on the road(s) fronting the site, sourced from state DOT data. For an express tunnel, retail capture typically falls between about 0.3% and 1.0% of daily traffic (a planning range the firm replaces with site evidence; no published study sets a standard capture rate), depending on visibility, access, speed limit, and competitive density; industry analysts caution that a flat 1% rule overstates many sites. A site on a 30,000 ADT arterial with good visibility and easy right-in/right-out access might capture 0.8%, producing a baseline of 240 cars per day before membership layering.
Membership volume layering. For express tunnels operating a membership model, the membership base generates predictable repeat volume independent of drive-by traffic. At an illustrative three washes per member per month, a site with 3,000 active members adds about 300 washes per day from members alone. The feasibility study models the membership ramp separately from drive-by traffic and projects the blended wash count month by month.
Seasonal adjustment. Car wash volume is seasonal in most U.S. markets. Winter months in northern states produce higher demand (road salt removal), while summer months produce higher demand in southern markets (pollen, dust). We apply regional seasonality factors to convert annual projections into monthly cash flow models that reflect the actual revenue timing lenders need to see. Snowfall days drive both retail washes and member frequency in salt-belt markets, so the ramp schedule depends on the opening month.
Revenue per car
Revenue per car (RPC) varies by wash model and market positioning. Our benchmarking draws on published industry data and comparable site performance in the target market.
| Revenue Component | Express Tunnel | Flex-Serve | Full-Service |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base wash price | $8 to $12 | $12 to $20 | $20 to $35 |
| Upsell / premium packages | $2 to $8 incremental | $5 to $15 incremental | $10 to $25 incremental |
| Membership revenue per wash (effective) | Price ÷ washes per member (e.g., $30 ÷ 3 washes = $10; illustrative) | $10 to $15 | N/A for most |
| Vacuum / detail add-ons | Free vacuum (traffic driver) | $3 to $10 | Included in package |
| Blended RPC (all customers) | $8 to $14 | $15 to $25 | $30 to $50 |
The membership model changes car wash economics. A member paying $30 a month and washing three times produces an effective RPC of $10 (illustrative), lower than a single-wash customer paying $12. But the predictability and volume of membership revenue typically more than compensates, producing higher total revenue and better revenue visibility for DSCR projections. Recurring revenue improves visibility, but only when churn, tenure and price are proven; Rinsed estimates that up to half of recent membership revenue growth came from price increases. The trend is visible in same-store data: in Q3 2026, membership revenue rose 9.8% while retail revenue fell 9.6% (Rinsed, 3,000+ sites).
Membership and subscription economics
The shift from transactional to subscription revenue is the single most important structural change in car wash economics. A feasibility study that does not model the membership ramp, churn rate, and steady-state base is incomplete for any express tunnel project.
Membership ramp. The ramp is modelled from presale results, gross additions and churn; the calculator below shows how those inputs set the base month by month. Year 1 DSCR will be materially lower than stabilized DSCR, and SBA lenders need to see that the project can survive the ramp period.
Churn rate. Industry average monthly churn ran 7.3% to 7.9% from Q4 2025 to Q3 2026; in Q3 2026 it was 7.8%, of which 4.5 points were voluntary cancellations and 3.3 points payment failures (Rinsed). At 7.8%, a site must add about 234 new members a month just to hold a 3,000-member base. The study projects gross additions, voluntary and involuntary churn separately, and net membership, not just a target number.
Revenue predictability. Recurring membership revenue smooths monthly cash flow and directly strengthens the DSCR case, but it has to be proven. Retail-to-member conversion rises with scale (17.1% at sites with more than 4,000 members, 10.7% at 2,000 to 4,000, and 3.3% below 2,000 in Q3 2026), and the median member stayed about 14.5 months in Rinsed’s Q4 2024 report. We model member cohorts, conversion, and tenure so the stabilized revenue a lender relies on is built from observable behavior, not an assumed penetration rate.
Equipment replacement reserve. Conveyors, brushes, dryers, pay stations, and reclaim systems wear out on different schedules. Conveyors, brushes, controllers and pay stations wear on different schedules, and the study prices replacement from the equipment schedule and service records. The financial model carries a replacement reserve and shows DSCR before and after it, because a coverage ratio that only works without the reserve is not lender-grade.
Sensitivity and stress testing. Every study includes a DSCR matrix that flexes retail capture, member count, churn, average membership price, and labor, alone and combined. For changes of ownership under SOP 50 10 8.1, where coverage is tested on historical earnings, we reconcile our normalized earnings to the figures the lender will use. See DSCR for SBA loans and the financial projections and DSCR methodology. See the October 2026 SBA feasibility monitor for current rule changes and our analysis of whether SBA acquisition loans default more; the special-purpose property guide covers the 504 equity step-up, and environmental due diligence covers wastewater and prior-use risk.
The membership equation, and why churn sets the ceiling
A membership base converges on a steady state equal to monthly gross additions divided by monthly churn. At the Q3 2026 industry average churn of 7.8 percent:
- every 100 new members a month supports about 1,280 members at maturity;
- 350 new members a month support about 4,490, close to Mister Car Wash’s Q1 2026 average of roughly 4,500 members per location.
A one-point rise in churn, from 7.8 to 8.8 percent, lowers the steady-state base by about 11 percent with no change in sales effort. That is why the study models gross additions, voluntary churn and payment-failure churn separately, and reports the churn rate at which coverage fails.
Membership ramp and opening-year coverage
A new express wash opens with few members and converts retail customers slowly, because conversion rises with scale. In Q3 2026, sites below 2,000 members converted 3.3 percent of retail customers, against 17.1 percent at sites above 4,000 (Rinsed). Labor, utilities, insurance, property taxes, software and debt service run at full weight from opening. The same ramp logic applies to new construction feasibility generally, and the Las Vegas self-storage case study shows a comparable lease-up model; projections follow our financial projection methodology.
The study therefore:
- models the member base month by month from presale through maturity;
- reports coverage by year from opening;
- identifies the first month in which run-rate coverage clears the lender’s standard;
- sizes the interest reserve and working capital needed to carry the deficit until then.
The ramp is tested against the conversion rate of a sub-2,000-member site, not that of a mature one.
In the illustrative case below, coverage runs at 0.47x in year one and 1.57x in year two before stabilizing at 2.23x, and run-rate coverage first clears 1.25x in month 14. A loan sized on the stabilized figure without a reserve for the first year would not survive opening.
Car wash membership ramp and DSCR calculator (illustrative)
- Steady-state members
- 4,487
- Members at month 12 / month 24
- 2,983 / 3,919
- Stabilized annual revenue
- $2,311,077
- Stabilized NOI
- $988,437
- Annual debt service
- $442,358
- DSCR: Year 1 / Year 2 / stabilized
- 0.47x / 1.57x / 2.23x
- First month at target coverage
- Month 14
- Members required for target coverage
- 3,120
- Churn at which stabilized coverage falls to target
- 11.2%
Members by month, months 0–36, at churn of input −1 point, input and input +1 point
| Month | Lower churn | Input churn | Higher churn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| 6 | 2101 | 2038 | 1976 |
| 12 | 3151 | 2983 | 2826 |
| 18 | 3839 | 3563 | 3315 |
| 24 | 4290 | 3919 | 3596 |
| 30 | 4585 | 4138 | 3758 |
| 36 | 4779 | 4273 | 3851 |
Illustrative defaults, not a benchmark or a feasibility determination. Only the churn default is drawn from published industry data. Inputs for a real file come from the subject’s site and market evidence.
How this is calculated
- c = churn; q = 1 − c; A = gross new members per month. Steady-state members S = A ÷ c.
- Members by month: M₀ = presale; Mₜ = Mₜ₋₁ × q + A, equivalently S + (M₀ − S) × qᵗ.
- Member contribution per member-month: m = price × (1 − card%) − washes per member × variable cost.
- Retail contribution per month: R = retail washes × (ticket × (1 − card%) − variable cost).
- Monthly NOI: NOIₜ = Mₜ × m + R − fixed − reserve.
- Annual debt service: DS = 12 × L × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)⁻ⁿ), with r = rate ÷ 12 and n = years × 12.
- Year 1 DSCR = ΣNOI (months 1–12) ÷ DS; Year 2 DSCR = ΣNOI (months 13–24) ÷ DS; stabilized DSCR = 12 × (S × m + R − fixed − reserve) ÷ DS.
- Members required: M_req = (target × DS ÷ 12 − R + fixed + reserve) ÷ m. First month at target: smallest t with Mₜ ≥ M_req.
- Churn at which stabilized DSCR equals target: c* = A ÷ M_req.
- Revenue: Mₜ × price + retail washes × ticket.
Trade area, saturation and pipeline
Car wash trade areas are tighter than most commercial properties. An express tunnel’s primary trade area is typically a 3 to 5 mile radius (or 5 to 8 minute drive time) in suburban markets. In dense urban areas, it may shrink to 1 to 2 miles. The secondary trade area extends to 5 to 8 miles but captures a much lower share of the population.
We inventory every car wash within the primary and secondary trade areas, classifying each by format (express, flex-serve, full-service, self-serve, in-bay automatic), brand affiliation, pricing, estimated throughput, observable condition, and any known expansion plans. The critical competitive question for express tunnels is saturation, and we compare express washes per 10,000 households, and members per site, against comparable markets. See our market analysis methodology.
Pipeline supply is especially important in car wash analysis. Many markets have new sites under construction or in permitting, and a trade area that appears undersupplied today may be oversupplied 12 months from now. We check local planning department records for pending car wash permits and cross-reference against construction activity visible on satellite imagery and site visits.
No published standard sets a households-per-site or drive-time saturation threshold, so the firm does not apply one. It benchmarks the trade area against comparable markets where operators perform and where they do not. Professional Carwashing & Detailing cited Colorado Springs, with 73 conveyor washes for about 750,000 residents (roughly one conveyor per 10,300 people), as an overbuilt submarket in 2026. The pipeline census includes permits, projects under construction, and municipal moratoria in the subject’s jurisdiction and its neighbours (see Exhibit 5).
Water reclamation and environmental requirements
Water usage and reclamation are not just environmental considerations; they are operating cost drivers that directly affect the financial model. EPA’s WaterSense guidance notes a friction conveyor uses about 65.8 gallons per vehicle without reclaim and as little as 7.8 with it (EPA WaterSense at Work, 2012, from ICA data collected 2000–2002). The International Carwash Association’s WaterSavers program recognizes washes that limit fresh water to 40 gallons per vehicle or less.
Reclaim is mandatory in some jurisdictions: California Water Code Section 10951 requires in-bay and conveyor washes permitted and constructed after January 1, 2014 to recycle at least 60% of wash and rinse water, or to use supplier-provided recycled water for at least 60%, and some cities require recycling systems on all new conveyor washes. Reclaim system cost is quoted for each project and carried in the development budget. The feasibility study models utility costs with and without reclamation where relevant, and confirms whether local ordinances mandate it.
Discharge permitting is another regulatory variable. There is no federal effluent guideline specific to car washes; instead, discharges to the sanitary sewer fall under the federal pretreatment rules (40 CFR Part 403) and the local sewer authority’s limits, discharge to storm drains must be avoided, and sites typically need grit traps and oil-water separators pumped out by licensed haulers. These requirements are confirmed during the site and regulatory assessment.
Car wash feasibility by format
Express exterior tunnel. This is the dominant new-build format, and the express car wash feasibility study is the most common engagement type. Revenue rests on membership, volume and throughput, and labor is lean. The credit turns on access, stacking, visibility, competitive density and the membership ramp. Tommy’s Express’s 2026 franchise disclosure, as reported by a franchise aggregator, puts total investment in this format at $3.48 million to $11.85 million. See SBA franchises for gas stations and car washes.
Flex-serve. Interior and detail services are added to an express tunnel. The ticket is higher, but labor is materially greater. The study models the service menu separately and stresses wage rates.
Full-service. Labor-intensive and throughput-constrained, and more often an acquisition or conversion than a new build. Coverage rests on ticket and labor productivity.
In-bay automatic and self-serve. Lower capital and lower volume, often an ancillary profit centre at a fuel site. Where fuel is sold, environmental review follows fuel-station rules; see the gas station feasibility study.
Acquisitions and conversions of existing washes. Under SOP 50 10 8.1, the seller’s history carries the coverage test. The study separates membership growth from price, tests churn and tenure in the seller’s own data, and prices the equipment replacement the buyer inherits.
2026 market evidence for car wash credits
Every figure carries its source and period. The firm updates this section when a primary release changes the answer. The full narrative is in the US Car Wash Industry Outlook 2026 to 2030.
Exhibit 3
The membership economy, Q4 2025 to Q3 2026
Membership revenue still grows near 10 percent a year, but retail volume fell 9.6 percent in Q3 2026 and churn has held near 8 percent a month. Rinsed estimates that up to half of membership revenue growth comes from price increases rather than new members.
| Quarter | Same-store sales | Membership revenue | Retail revenue | Monthly churn (voluntary / payment failure) | Retail-to-member conversion (4,000+ / 2,000–4,000 / under 2,000 members) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2025 | +4.8% | +11.3% | — | 7.6% (4.6 / 3.0) | — |
| Q1 2026 | +5.8% | +10.6% | −3.3% | 7.3% (4.5 / 2.8) | 15.4% / 9.8% / 3.4% |
| Q2 2026 | +5.4% | +10.4% | −3.9% | 7.9% (4.9 / 3.0) | 17.3% / 10.4% / 2.4% |
| Q3 2026 | +3.2% (mature sites +1.1%) | +9.8% | −9.6% | 7.8% (4.5 / 3.3) | 17.1% / 10.7% / 3.3% |
Membership and retail revenue growth by quarter, percent year over year
| Quarter | Membership | Retail |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2025 | 11.3% | not reported |
| Q1 2026 | 10.6% | -3.3% |
| Q2 2026 | 10.4% | -3.9% |
| Q3 2026 | 9.8% | -9.6% |
About 234
new members a month (roughly 2,800 a year) to hold a 3,000-member base at 7.8% churn
About 5x
conversion at 4,000+ member sites vs sub-2,000 sites (17.1% vs 3.3%)
About 71%
memberships’ share of same-store revenue, Q3 2026
Firm arithmetic on Rinsed Q3 2026.
Mister Car Wash: UWC (membership) sales were 79 percent of wash sales in Q4 2025 and 76 percent in Q1 2026. It had 2.468 million members at Q1 2026, comparable-store sales of +3.9 percent, and 549 locations.
Exhibit 4
The supply cycle has turned
The build cycle has turned. The 50 largest operators more than tripled their site counts in six years, a 260-site chain went through Chapter 11 citing new supply, and tunnel production is still falling in 2026. A 2026 study underwrites a maturing market, not a land rush.
| Indicator | Value | Source and date |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. conveyor washes | More than 20,000 (estimate) | Professional Carwashing & Detailing, 2026 |
| Top 50 conveyor companies | 1,574 sites (2018) to 5,279 (2024), +235% | Professional Carwashing & Detailing, 2025 |
| New conveyor sites | At least 800 a year before rate increases; 600–700 estimated for 2024 | Professional Carwashing & Detailing, State of Carwashing 2024 |
| 2026 tunnel production | Expected down mid-single digits from 2025 | Professional Carwashing & Detailing, late 2025 |
| Zips Car Wash Chapter 11 | Filed February 5, 2025, with about 260 locations in 23 states and $654 million of debt. Sought to close 41 locations (about 16 percent). Cut about $279 million of debt. Emerged April 30, 2025, owned by its lenders, with about 230 locations. Its first-day declaration cited about 900 new openings a year over the prior five years. | Company release (Business Wire); CoStar; court reporting |
| Driven Brands car wash exit | About 400 U.S. sites sold to Whistle Express for $385 million ($255 million cash plus a $130 million seller note); closed April 2025. Whistle reached 530+ sites. | Driven Brands investor release; CollisionWeek |
| Mister Car Wash take-private | Leonard Green & Partners, $7.00 per share, $3.1 billion enterprise value. Announced February 18, 2026; closed May 19, 2026. | Cleary Gottlieb; Mister Car Wash Form 8-K |
Exhibit 5
Car Wash Entitlement Watch: municipal moratoria and restrictions, 2025–2026
At least six U.S. municipalities paused or restricted new car washes between August 2025 and August 2026. Entitlement is now a named risk in every greenfield study. For a site that is already entitled, the same moratorium protects the trade area from new competition.
| Jurisdiction | Date | Action | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomington, IN | August 6, 2025 | Ordinance 2025-28 limits “vehicle wash” to the Mixed-Use Corridor district; passed 7–0 | In force | City of Bloomington |
| Carson, CA | December 3, 2025 | 45-day urgency moratorium on new or expanded car washes pending zoning review | Urgency measure | City council record |
| Mission, TX | March 24, 2026 | Ordinance 5794: 180-day moratorium applied to pending applications, citing drought; the city already enforced a one-mile spacing rule | Later repealed; related lawsuit dismissed | MyRGV |
| Warren, MI | May 19, 2026 | Moratorium on new gas stations and car washes; the city has 25 car washes | Adopted | C&G Newspapers |
| Roseville, MI | May 26, 2026 | 2025 moratorium extended by six months | Extended | C&G Newspapers |
| Trussville, AL | August 25, 2026 | Mini-warehouse moratorium amended to add car washes | Adopted | City council meeting record |
No national count is published. This tracker lists only actions the firm has verified, and is updated as new actions are confirmed. Last updated October 26, 2026. Report a moratorium
Exhibit 6
What a car wash location is worth: the 2025–2026 transaction record
Recent transactions value a car wash location anywhere from under $1 million to more than $5.6 million. Value follows membership depth, site quality and real estate rights, not tunnel count. Net-lease cap rates price a corporate lease, not an owner-operator’s risk.
| Transaction | Value | Locations | Value per location (firm arithmetic) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mister Car Wash take-private (2026) | $3.1B enterprise value | 548 (December 31, 2025) | about $5.66M | Most sites are leased (493 of 549 at Q1 2026), so the figure is predominantly operating-business value. About 9.0x 2025 adjusted EBITDA (Raymond James, Spring 2026). |
| Driven Brands U.S. car wash sale (2025) | $385M including a $130M seller note | about 400 | about $0.96M | Mixed portfolio; includes seller financing. |
| Zips Car Wash restructuring (2025) | $654M debt at filing; about $279M eliminated | about 260 at filing | about $2.5M of debt per location | Debt reduced by about 43 percent; equity reported wiped out. |
B+E NNN Car Wash Listed Inventory, April 2026: 190 listings (down from 213), 6.21 percent average asking cap rate (from 6.25 percent), and a 19.0-year average remaining lease term, cited by Raymond James in Spring 2026. Reported averages were 6.24 percent in January 2026 and 6.32 percent in July 2026. Test your own figures with the cap rate calculator.
Exhibit 7
Water and environmental requirements
Water rules are a cost line, not a footnote. California mandates reclamation by statute; elsewhere, the requirement is set city by city and confirmed for each site.
| Item | Rule or figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| California Water Code §10951 | In-bay and conveyor car washes “permitted and constructed after January 1, 2014” must recycle at least 60 percent of wash and rinse water, or use supplier-provided recycled water for at least 60 percent. | California Legislature (AB 2230, 2012) |
| Fresh water per vehicle, friction conveyor | 65.8 gallons without reclaim; as low as 7.8 with reclaim (frictionless: 85.3 and 16.8) | EPA WaterSense at Work 5.5 (2012), from ICA data collected 2000–2002 |
| ICA WaterSavers | Fresh water limited to 40.0 gallons per vehicle or less | EPA WaterSense, citing ICA |
| Sewer discharge | Discharges to sanitary sewer fall under the federal pretreatment rules (40 CFR Part 403) and local sewer authority limits | 40 CFR Part 403 |
| SBA environmental starting point | A car-wash-only facility may begin with a Transaction Screen. A Phase I applies where fuel is sold, and automotive repair or lube bays fall under the listed automotive-repair NAICS group without the car-wash exception. | SBA environmentally sensitive industries list (SOP 50 10 8 Appendix 6; confirm wording in 8.1) |
Reclaim system cost is quoted for each project. The only published federal figure, about $35,000 from a 2002 ICA study cited by EPA, is too old to underwrite.
Car wash feasibility study vs market study vs appraisal
Exhibit 8
Market study, feasibility study and going-concern appraisal compared
The feasibility study answers whether the debt works. The appraisal answers what the collateral is worth. The two must reconcile on stabilized income.
| Market study | Feasibility study | Going-concern appraisal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question | Is there room in this trade area for another wash, and in what format? | Can this wash, under this capital structure, service this debt? | What is the going concern worth, and how does that value divide? |
| Scope | Competitive and pipeline census, traffic and demographics, format recommendation. | The market study, plus budget, membership cohort model, operating costs, ramp, DSCR by year and stress cases. | Income, sales comparison and cost approaches; allocation. |
| Output | Positioning and a market-level outlook. | Determination. | Market value opinion allocated among land, building, equipment and intangibles. |
| Standard | No prescribed federal standard. | Lender and SBA review; USPAP applies only where an opinion of value is developed. | USPAP, FIRREA and the Interagency Guidelines, plus SOP appraiser qualifications. |
| Prepared by | Market analyst. | Independent consultant, addressed to the lender. | State Certified General appraiser with going-concern experience. |
See also feasibility study vs business plan and what to expect in the report.
How car washes are valued: appraisal methodology and standards
The feasibility study and the appraisal answer different questions, but in an SBA file they have to agree. The study tests whether the wash can generate its projected cash flow; the appraisal converts that cash flow into value, allocates it, and sets the collateral position.
The standards behind the file
The appraisal follows USPAP (2024 edition, which has no fixed expiration date); Standards Rule 1-4(g) requires the appraiser to analyze personal property and intangible items included in the appraisal, which always applies to an operating car wash. For federally regulated lenders, the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines bar using going concern value or value in use as market value; those values may be reported separately only if clearly identified. SBA’s going-concern appraisal rules call for a Certified General appraiser with recent going-concern experience on equivalent special-use property (language carried in SOP 50 10 8; confirm in 8.1) and separate values for land, building, equipment, and intangible assets.
Income approach
For an operating wash, appraisers place the most weight on income. Stabilized net operating income is built from retail and membership revenue, less chemicals, utilities, labor, repairs, a market management fee, and an equipment replacement reserve. Income multipliers (gross income and EBITDA) are widely used alongside direct capitalization. Net-lease car wash cap rates are a reference point, not a substitute: listed net-lease washes averaged a 6.21% asking cap rate across 190 listings in April 2026 (B+E data cited by Raymond James, Spring 2026) and about 6.32% in July 2026, but those rates price a long-term corporate lease, not owner-operator risk. New builds use a discounted cash flow that captures the membership ramp.
Sales comparison approach
Units of comparison include EBITDA multiple, revenue multiple, price per car washed, and price per square foot; per-square-foot pricing gets only limited weight because it ignores throughput and membership. Mister Car Wash’s 2026 take-private implied about 9 times 2025 adjusted EBITDA (Raymond James, Spring 2026). Adjustments address membership share and churn, tunnel length and equipment age, competitive pipeline, access and visibility, and property rights conveyed (fee simple versus leased fee versus business-only).
Cost approach
Land plus the replacement cost new of the building, tunnel equipment, vacuums, pay stations, and reclaim systems, less physical deterioration, functional obsolescence (short tunnels, single-lane pay stations, poor stacking), and external obsolescence. In oversupplied trade areas, the gap between depreciated cost and income-based value measures external obsolescence, and the study’s competitive pipeline census is the evidence for it. A going-concern value below depreciated cost is a warning sign that the improvements may not be the highest and best use.
Allocation: real estate, equipment, and intangibles
Car washes are a textbook going concern: real estate, machinery and equipment, and business value combined (ASA course RP401 names car washes explicitly). One accepted method values the real property at a market net-lease rent and treats the operating business as what remains after paying that rent. Equipment is a large share of a tunnel’s value, and the membership base, brand, and workforce sit mostly in business intangibles. The allocation shapes the SBA loan directly: real estate supports up to a 25-year term while equipment and goodwill carry shorter terms, and under SOP 50 10 8.1 change-of-ownership loans use a blended weighted-average maturity.
Highest and best use and conversion
Every appraisal tests highest and best use as vacant and as improved: legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally productive. For a wash, the as-improved test weighs continued operation against conversion to another use, net of equipment removal and site work. The feasibility study supplies the financially feasible test, which is why lenders read the two reports together.
| Approach | What it measures | Where it carries weight | What the feasibility study supplies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | Value of stabilized cash flow | Operating washes, acquisitions | Retail capture, members, churn, pricing, expenses, stabilized NOI |
| Sales comparison | What buyers pay for similar washes | Markets with recent comparable sales | Membership and volume data to match comparables |
| Cost | Cost to build less depreciation | New construction, ceiling test | Pipeline census as evidence of external obsolescence |
| Highest and best use | Whether continued car wash use is the most productive use | Every special purpose appraisal | The financially feasible test: demand and pro forma |
SBA eligibility and structure checklist for car wash loans
Exhibit 9
SBA eligibility and structure requirements for car wash loans
Most car wash eligibility questions are settled. The open variables are the environmental starting point when fuel or service bays are present, the brand’s Directory status, and the 8.1 coverage test on acquisitions.
Property and equity
| Requirement | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Special-purpose status | “Car wash businesses” appear in the SOP list of limited or special-purpose properties | SBA SOP 50 10 series, as reproduced by a CDC |
| 504 borrower contribution | At least 15% for a limited- or single-purpose building; 15% for a business operating two years or less; 20% when both apply | 13 CFR 120.910(a) |
| 504 structure and debenture | Typically bank 50%, CDC 35%, borrower 15% at a 15% contribution. The 504 debenture is limited to an outstanding balance of $5 million for each borrower and its affiliates, or $5.5 million per project for small manufacturers and energy-reduction projects | 13 CFR 120.931 |
| 7(a) maximum | $5,000,000 | 13 CFR 120.151 |
| 7(a) acquisition injection | 10% on an initial acquisition; it cannot be reduced for an initial acquisition; it may be waived for business expansions and owner buyouts. Seller standby debt, other standby debt and outside investor equity combined: no more than 50% of the required injection | SOP 50 10 8.1 (secondary summaries) |
Environmental and franchise
| Requirement | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | A car-wash-only facility may begin with a Transaction Screen. A Phase I applies where fuel is sold. Service and lube bays fall under the automotive-repair group without the car-wash exception | SBA environmentally sensitive industries list |
| Franchise Directory | A brand meeting the FTC franchise definition must be listed. Brands without the updated certification by June 30, 2026 were removed and are no longer eligible. Check the listing and certification flag on the date the loan number is assigned | SBA Office of Capital Access notice, December 23, 2025 |
Size and structure
| Requirement | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Size standard | $9.0 million in average annual receipts (NAICS 811192). An August 20, 2026 proposed rule would consolidate size standards without reducing any existing standard; comments are due November 20, 2026. The current standard applies until a final rule takes effect | SBA Table of Size Standards; 91 FR 53741 |
| EPC/OC structure | The EPC leases 100% of the property to the OC. Each owner of 20% or more guarantees. The OC is guarantor or co-borrower | 13 CFR 120.111 |
Appraisal and maturity
| Requirement | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Going-concern appraisal | Certified General appraiser with recent going-concern experience on equivalent special-use property. Separate values for land, building, equipment and intangible assets | SOP 50 10 8 language; confirm in 8.1 |
| Maturity | Real estate up to 25 years. Under 8.1, change-of-ownership loans use separate loans or a weighted-average blended maturity | 13 CFR 120.212; SOP 50 10 8.1 |
Program detail: SBA 7(a) feasibility study, SBA 504 feasibility study, 7(a) vs 504 and the CDC compliance guide. On a $4 million express tunnel project, the difference between 10% and 20% equity is $400,000.
Engaging the firm: process, fee and timeline
1. Scoping call
15 minutes, no cost.
2. Written proposal within one business day
Scope, method, timeline, firm fixed fee and acceptance guarantee terms.
3. Engagement
Engagement letter; structured data request within one to two business days; mid-point findings review on substantial engagements; delivery; support through lender acceptance.
Car wash studies are quoted at $4,900 to $14,000, fixed before work begins. Single-format express tunnels in well-documented markets sit at the lower end. Multi-format sites, data-sparse markets and trade areas that need extensive pipeline research sit at the upper end. Delivery runs 7 to 12 business days from a complete data response. The fee does not depend on the conclusion or on whether the loan closes. Every inquiry is answered within one business day. See the cost and timeline guide and the feasibility study checklist.
Data request checklist
- Site address and parcel; traffic counts, if held.
- Site plan: lanes, stacking, tunnel length, vacuums, ingress and egress.
- Format and equipment package quotes.
- Brand or franchise proposal, if any.
- Development budget or purchase contract.
- Proposed loan structure, SBA program, and lender or CDC.
- For existing washes:
- three years of P&L statements and tax returns;
- point-of-sale and membership-platform exports (members, gross additions, cancellations, payment failures, price history, wash counts by package);
- utility bills;
- equipment age and service records.
- Water permits and reclaim specifications.
- Any appraisal, Transaction Screen or Phase I already in the file.
- Sponsor’s car wash operating experience.
Request Your Free Feasibility Study Consultation
Car wash feasibility study FAQ
More answers: SBA feasibility study FAQ and the glossary. Background: SBA car wash feasibility study guide and how much car washes make.
Our research on what SBA debt can actually support by asset class compares car wash loan performance and going-concern cap rates with 7(a) and 504 coverage floors, including an illustrative express tunnel development.
Work with the firm’s car wash feasibility study consultants
Studies are signed by David Jones, MAI, CCIM. Every car wash project we underwrite follows the same lender ready process: independent market analysis, site and technical review, and financial projections tested against SBA SOP 50 10 8.1. Our SBA feasibility study consultants guide explains scope, timing, deliverables, and what lenders and CDCs expect in the report.
How this page is verified
Program rules are checked against 13 CFR Parts 120 and 121 and SBA SOP 50 10 8 and 8.1. Every market figure names its source and date. Last verified October 26, 2026.
Sources
- eCFR, 13 CFR 120.160, 120.910, 120.931, 120.151, 120.111 and 120.212 (current) — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-13/chapter-I/part-120
- U.S. Small Business Administration, Information Notices 5000-880695 (August 14, 2026) and 5000-882227 (September 25, 2026) — https://www.sba.gov/document/information-notice
- U.S. Small Business Administration, SOP 50 10 page (updated October 7, 2026) — https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs
- SBA Office of Capital Access, franchise directory certification notice (December 23, 2025) — https://www.sba.gov/document/support-sba-franchise-directory
- Federal Register, 91 FR 53741, proposed size standards (August 20, 2026) — https://www.federalregister.gov
- NAGGL, SOP 50 10 8.1 summaries (August 14 and September 25, 2026) — https://www.naggl.org
- Doeren Mayhew, SOP 50 10 8.1 commentary (August 2026) — https://www.doeren.com
- EBIT Community, SOP 50 10 8.1 commentary (August 2026) — https://www.ebitcommunity.com
- Starfield & Smith, SOP 50 10 8.1 commentary (September 2026) — https://www.starfieldsmith.com
- Cantrell, SOP 50 10 8.1 commentary (October 2026)
- Rinsed, quarterly car wash industry reports: Q4 2025, Q1 2026, Q2 2026 and Q3 2026 (January 26, April 22, July 22 and October 21, 2026) — https://www.rinsed.co
- CarwashPro (July 29, 2026) — https://www.carwashpro.com
- Mister Car Wash, Q4 2025 release (February 18, 2026), Q1 2026 Form 10-Q (April 29, 2026) and Form 8-K (May 19, 2026) — https://www.sec.gov
- Cleary Gottlieb, Mister Car Wash take-private transaction note (2026) — https://www.clearygottlieb.com
- Zips Car Wash, Business Wire releases (February 5 and May 1, 2025); CoStar coverage — https://www.businesswire.com
- Driven Brands, investor release (February 25, 2025); CollisionWeek — https://investors.drivenbrands.com
- Professional Carwashing & Detailing, State of Carwashing and industry coverage (2024–2026) — https://www.carwash.com
- B+E, NNN Car Wash Listed Inventory (April 2026); Raymond James, Car Wash Insight (Spring 2026) — https://www.raymondjames.com
- U.S. EPA, WaterSense at Work, Section 5.5 (2012) — https://www.epa.gov/watersense
- California Water Code §10951 (AB 2230, 2012) — https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- eCFR, 40 CFR Part 403, general pretreatment regulations — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/part-403
- Moratoria: City of Bloomington; MyRGV; C&G Newspapers; Carson, CA and Trussville, AL city council records
- U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan-level data (as of March 31, 2026) — https://data.sba.gov
Changelog
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| October 26, 2026 | Page rebuilt for lender and sponsor engagement. Added the SBA Car Wash Lending Ledger with special-purpose class comparison, the SOP 50 10 8.1 acquisition tests, the membership ramp calculator, the Rinsed Q4 2025–Q3 2026 series, and the Car Wash Entitlement Watch. Corrected the construction-cycle, churn, conversion, cap-rate and water-use figures. Relabelled unverified operating ranges as firm planning ranges. |