Apartments · Mixed-use · Affordable and workforce housing

    Multifamily Feasibility Study Consultants for Every Capital Source

    Feasibility and market studies for HUD, LIHTC, USDA, agency, bank and SBA mixed-use financing

    SBA Feasibility Study LLC is an independent multifamily feasibility study consultant to lenders, developers, tax credit applicants and investors. Apartment buildings are not eligible for SBA financing, so the firm’s multifamily work follows the capital source:

    Each study is built to the standard of the program that will read it: rents developed independently from comparables, demand measured as income-qualified renter households, lease-up and pipeline taken from local evidence, and coverage tested at 2026 debt costs.

    By David Jones, MAI, CCIM, Principal · Last reviewed October 26, 2026 · Program rules current to October 2026

    4,300+

    feasibility studies by the principal

    MAI · CCIM

    credentials of the signatory

    12

    capital sources mapped to their study rules

    2026

    HUD, LIHTC and USDA rule changes applied

    1 business day

    fixed-fee proposal

    On this page

    What a multifamily feasibility study consultant does

    A multifamily feasibility study consultant tests, independently of the sponsor, whether a proposed, acquired or rehabilitated apartment project can lease, hold and price its units well enough to support the proposed debt and equity. The study:

    • names the capital source and its standard;
    • defines the primary market area;
    • develops rents independently from comparables, and applies program rent limits and rent regulation;
    • measures demand as income-, size- and age-qualified renter households, with capture and penetration rates;
    • inventories competing supply and pipeline by name;
    • estimates lease-up from local evidence;
    • reports coverage through lease-up and at refinance under 2026 debt costs.

    It closes with a determination addressed to the lender or agency.

    The determination

    Feasible

    The project meets the lender or program coverage standard in the base case and remains serviceable under the stated downside.

    The determination

    Feasible subject to stated conditions

    The credit works only if named conditions hold, such as a lower loan amount, a revised unit mix, an interest reserve sized to lease-up, or rents at the program limit.

    The determination

    Not feasible as proposed

    The evidence does not support the debt and equity as structured. The study states what would have to change.

    Multifamily study requirements by capital source

    Exhibit 1

    Which study does your apartment deal need?

    A market study is a rule only for HUD 221(d)(4), LIHTC and USDA rural rental housing. For agency, bank, life-company and debt-fund loans it is customary, and the lender’s credit policy sets the standard. For SBA it is discretionary, and apartments are not eligible at all.

    Capital sourceStudy required?Governing standardWho prepares itKey 2026 thresholdsCitation
    SBA mixed-useDiscretionary (“SBA may require”)13 CFR 120.160(b); SOP 50 10 8 / 8.1Independent third party acceptable to lender and SBA51/49 existing; 60/20 new construction; resident space ≤49% if essential; 7(a) acquisitions 1.25x; 504 1.15:113 CFR 120.131, 120.160(b)
    HUD 221(d)(4)RuleMAP Guide (2020) Ch. 7, §7.5; EMAD reviewThird-party market analyst engaged through the MAP lender; rents developed independently of the appraiser87% / 1.15x market rate; 90% / 1.11x affordable with rent advantage; study valid 120 days from pre-application, 180 days from firm commitmentML 2025-03; MAP Guide §7.5.2
    HUD 223(f)Appraisal-led for stabilized assetsMAP Guide Ch. 7MAP appraiser87% / 1.15x; 90% / 1.11xML 2025-03
    LIHTC 9%RuleIRC §42(m)(1)(A)(iii); state QAP; NCHMA definitions by referenceDisinterested third-party analyst meeting the HFA’s rules (e.g., Texas 10 TAC §11.303(c))Texas capture rate ≤10%TDHCA QAP
    LIHTC 4% bondRule (issuer/HFA)QAP and issuer rules; 25% bond test from 2026As 9%Texas 15% large-metro bond allowance proposed for removal in the 2027 draftP.L. 119-21; TAAHP
    USDA Section 515Rule7 CFR 3560Market evidence acceptable to Rural DevelopmentDirect loan program; FY2026 funding $50 million7 CFR 3560; NCSHA
    USDA Section 538Rule (lender-submitted)7 CFR 3565; HB-1-3565Lender-engaged third-party analystLTC ≤80% (Option 3); DSCR 1.11 pilot; tenant income ≤115% AMI91 FR 60930
    Fannie MaeCustomaryDUS Guide; appraisal market analysisAppraiser or lender$88B 2026 cap; ≥50% mission-drivenFHFA
    Freddie MacCustomaryOptigo GuideAppraiser or lenderAs Fannie MaeFHFA
    Bank constructionCustomary (credit policy)Bank policy; FIRREA appraisal; HVCREBank-engaged consultant150% risk weight on HVCRE loans unless exempt12 CFR 3.2
    Life companyCustomary (appraisal-led)InternalAppraiser——
    Debt fundCustomary or noneInternalAppraiser or consultantCRE CLO multifamily delinquency 3.88% (September 2026)Trepp
    Cite this

    SBA Feasibility Study LLC, Multifamily study requirements by capital source, 2026. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

    Source: 13 CFR Part 120; SBA SOP 50 10 8 and 8.1; HUD Mortgagee Letter 2025-03 (January 8, 2025) and MAP Guide (2020); IRC §42; TDHCA 2026 QAP and 10 TAC §11.303; TAAHP (2026); 91 FR 60930 (September 25, 2026); FHFA (November 24, 2025); 12 CFR 3.2; Trepp (October 2026). Compiled by the firm; verified October 26, 2026.

    How to choose a multifamily feasibility study consultant

    A lender or agency reads a multifamily study to decide whether it can rely on it. Seven tests separate a study that survives review from one that comes back with questions. They apply to any consultant, including this firm, and mirror our guide on how to choose a feasibility consultant and the three-pillar feasibility methodology. See the case study library for completed engagements.

    1. Test 1

      The program standard is named in the engagement letter.

      The letter names the MAP Guide section, the QAP year and agency, HB-1-3565, or the lender’s credit policy. A study written for one program is not automatically accepted by another.

    2. Test 2

      The analyst meets the program’s preparer rules.

      HUD: rents developed independently of the appraiser. LIHTC: a disinterested third party meeting the HFA’s rules. HFAs that require it: NCHMA peer review. Where an allocating agency or HUD requires a study from a listed, peer-reviewed or MAP-lender-engaged analyst, the firm prepares the sponsor’s or lender’s independent feasibility analysis, and its engagement letter states whether the firm meets that program’s preparer requirements.

    3. Test 3

      Rents are built from comparables, with adjustments documented.

      Rents are shown per unit and per square foot. LIHTC rent limits, Fair Market Rents and local rent regulation are applied where they bind.

    4. Test 4

      Demand is measured, not asserted.

      Income-, size- and age-qualified renter households are counted, and capture and penetration rates are stated against the allocating agency’s thresholds.

    5. Test 5

      Supply and lease-up come from local evidence.

      The pipeline is named, lease-up comparables are documented, and the provider and measurement basis for every vacancy and rent figure is disclosed.

    6. Test 6

      Coverage is shown through lease-up and at refinance.

      DSCR is tested against the program threshold: HUD 1.15x or 1.11x; USDA 538 1.11 pilot; otherwise lender policy. A refinance test is run at current debt costs.

    7. Test 7

      The consultant is willing to say no.

      The published record includes findings of not feasible, or feasible only with conditions.

    Questions to ask before you signHow this firm answers
    Which program standard will the study be written to?Named in the engagement letter.
    Does the analyst meet that program’s preparer requirements?The engagement letter states whether the firm meets that program’s preparer requirements.
    How will rents be developed?Independently from adjusted comparables, with program limits applied.
    How will demand be measured?Income-qualified renter households, with capture and penetration.
    Which vacancy and rent series will be used?One provider per series, basis disclosed, never spliced.
    What happens after delivery?Support through lender or agency review.

    Written proposal with a firm fixed fee within one business day.

    Request a fixed-fee quote

    Who prepares your multifamily feasibility study

    Every study is prepared under and signed by David Jones, MAI, CCIM, Principal of SBA Feasibility Study LLC, who has completed more than 4,300 feasibility studies over his career. Every report identifies the analyst and the reviewer. The firm does not white-label its work, and it issues no unsigned drafts that later become the basis for a credit decision. The firm’s studies have been accepted by 534 SBA 7(a) lenders and 107 Certified Development Companies across 50 states.

    The firm is not a lender, broker, developer, syndicator or property manager.

    Where an allocating agency or HUD requires a study from a listed, peer-reviewed or MAP-lender-engaged analyst, the firm prepares the sponsor’s or lender’s independent feasibility analysis, and its engagement letter states whether the firm meets that program’s preparer requirements.

    Determinations are the firm’s independent findings. Credit, award and eligibility decisions rest with the lender, the agency and SBA.

    Multifamily study requirements, program by program

    HUD/FHA 221(d)(4) and 223(f): the HUD 221(d)(4) market study

    Section 221(d)(4) requires a third-party market study under MAP Guide Chapter 7, Section 7.5, with rents developed independently of the appraiser. The MAP Guide is the 2020 edition, amended by Mortgagee Letters.

    A February 26, 2026 HUD drafting-table Mortgagee Letter proposes changes to these dating rules and to EMAD review. It remains a draft. Where an allocating agency or HUD requires a study from a listed, peer-reviewed or MAP-lender-engaged analyst, the firm prepares the sponsor’s or lender’s independent feasibility analysis, and its engagement letter states whether the firm meets that program’s preparer requirements.

    Exhibit 2

    HUD/FHA multifamily parameters, 2025–2026

    HUD loosened leverage in 2025 and cut mortgage insurance to 25 basis points for applications from October 2025. Studies built on earlier parameters understate supportable proceeds.

    ParameterCurrentPreviousSource
    Market-rate 221(d)(4) and 223(f)87% LTC/LTV at 1.15x85% at 1.176xML 2025-03 (January 8, 2025)
    Affordable with rent advantage90% at 1.11x87% at 1.15xML 2025-03
    Rental assistance and middle-income 221(d)(4)90% at 1.11x—ML 2025-02 (January 8, 2025)
    Mortgage insurance premium25 bp upfront and annual for all FHA multifamily programs, on applications submitted or amended on or after October 1, 2025Up to 70 bp for Section 207 new constructionHUD notice FR-6522-N-02 (September 23, 2025)
    Environmental reviewMAP Guide §9.6.19.B replaced; standalone railroad-vibration review removed—ML 2026-04 (May 4, 2026)
    Source: HUD Mortgagee Letters 2025-02 and 2025-03 (January 8, 2025) and 2026-04 (May 4, 2026); HUD notice FR-6522-N-02 (September 23, 2025).

    LIHTC 9% and 4%: the LIHTC market study

    Section 42 requires a market study for every tax credit allocation (IRC §42(m)(1)(A)(iii)), and each state’s Qualified Allocation Plan sets the preparer rules and thresholds. Where an allocating agency or HUD requires a study from a listed, peer-reviewed or MAP-lender-engaged analyst, the firm prepares the sponsor’s or lender’s independent feasibility analysis, and its engagement letter states whether the firm meets that program’s preparer requirements.

    Exhibit 3

    LIHTC in 2026

    2026 carries the largest permanent expansion of the 9% credit in decades and a lower bond test. More deals will reach the market-study gate, and capture-rate thresholds still bind.

    Item2026 rule or figureSource
    9% allocationsPermanently increased 12% starting in 2026P.L. 119-21, July 4, 2025
    2026 per-state ceilingGreater of $3.416 × state population or $3,953,600IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §4.08, as corrected; Novogradac, December 2025
    4% bond testLowered permanently from 50% to 25% for buildings placed in service after December 31, 2025, where at least 5% of aggregate basis is financed with bonds issued after that dateP.L. 119-21
    National 2026 volume9% LIHTC $1.20 billion (+14.4%); private activity bond pool $50.4 billionNovogradac
    Rent limitsGross rent ≤30% of the applicable income limit, imputed at 1.5 persons per bedroom (1 person for studios), using HUD Multifamily Tax Subsidy Project income limits; utility allowance includedIRC §42(g)
    Source: P.L. 119-21 (July 4, 2025); IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §4.08, as corrected; Novogradac (December 2025); IRC §42(g).

    Capture, penetration and absorption (NCHMA definitions)

    Threshold
    Capture rate5.0%WITHIN
    Penetration rate27.8%
    Threshold10%
    Absorption period10 months
    Maximum subject units at threshold240 units
    • Allocating agencies define capture differently; some include unstabilized comparable units in the numerator. The study applies the agency’s own formula and current QAP.
    • Lease-up pace is an input from local comparables, not a national standard.

    USDA rural rental housing: the USDA 538 market study

    USDA finances rural rental housing through Section 515 direct loans (7 CFR 3560) and Section 538 guarantees (7 CFR 3565). Both require market evidence acceptable to Rural Development. USDA Business & Industry guarantees do not finance apartments: 7 CFR 5001.118(a) excludes “apartments, duplexes, or other residential housing where the primary purpose is independent housing.”

    Exhibit 4

    USDA rural rental housing: what changed in 2026

    Section 538 underwriting loosened materially in September 2026. Higher leverage, a 1.11 coverage pilot and lower Opportunity Zone fees make rural workforce and affordable projects that failed in 2025 worth re-testing.

    ItemRule or figureSource
    Section 538 Option 3 LTCRaised from 70% to 80% of total development cost91 FR 60930 (September 25, 2026)
    Section 538 DSCR pilot1.11 for the first 200 loans closed, October 9, 2026 to September 25, 202891 FR 60930
    Pilot termsDeveloper fee capped at 15% of total development cost when not funded by LIHTC or government sources; risk-tiered underwriting; HUD capital needs assessments and environmental reports may be accepted91 FR 60930
    Section 538 feesRevised effective September 30, 2026; Opportunity Zone projects pay 60 bp initial and 25 bp annualFederal Register (September 30, 2026)
    Section 515 portfolio12,014 properties and 379,894 units remain. 621 properties and 14,928 units left between June 2021 and March 2026, nearly 5% of properties.Housing Assistance Council (2026)
    FY2026 fundingSection 515 $50 million; Multifamily Preservation and Revitalization (MPR) $30 million; rental-assistance decoupling for up to 5,000 unitsNCSHA (November 2025)
    PreservationPreservation Pilot for 515 transfers; Simple Transfer Pilot extended91 FR 60930; 91 FR 18275
    Source: 91 FR 60930 (September 25, 2026); Federal Register (September 30, 2026); 91 FR 18275; Housing Assistance Council (2026); NCSHA (November 2025).

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

    FHFA set 2026 multifamily purchase caps of $88 billion for each Enterprise, $176 billion combined and up 20.5 percent. At least 50 percent must be mission-driven, and workforce housing is excluded from the cap (FHFA, November 24, 2025). Agency loans are appraisal-led; a third-party market study is customary where lease-up or market depth is in question. Fannie Mae’s Q2 2026 acquisitions carried an average original LTV of 63 percent and DSCR of 1.9x.

    Banks, life companies and debt funds

    SBA and multifamily: what SBA can and cannot finance

    Apartment buildings are not eligible for SBA 7(a) or 504 financing. SBA’s SOP states that “Apartment buildings and mobile home parks are not eligible” (SOP 50 10 8, Section A, Chapter 1, Paragraph E.3), under the passive-business rule at 13 CFR 120.110(c). No management structure changes that, because the revenue is still residential rent. Our SBA feasibility study NAICS requirement map shows which codes trigger a study, and the October 2026 SBA feasibility monitor tracks the SOP 50 10 8.1 carry-forward language.

    SBA can finance a building with apartments in it when an eligible operating business occupies the required share of a mixed-use building:

    For those files, the study proves two things: that the building meets SBA’s occupancy test, and that the operating business, not the apartment rent, repays the loan, using the financial projection and DSCR methodology and site and regulatory assessment applied to every SBA file. Licensed care follows its own path, covered in our assisted living feasibility study guide. Lodging is the separate path: hotels and RV parks and campgrounds qualify on the transient-revenue test. The Leander limited-service hotel case study and Fredericksburg RV resort case study show how those files are underwritten, and the US hotel market report and RV park lending outlook cover current market conditions. For the full program choice, compare the SBA 7(a) vs 504 feasibility requirements and the CDC guide for 504 projects.

    Exhibit 5

    SBA residential eligibility map

    SBA’s residential line is not about who manages the building but about what produces the revenue. An operating business that owns residential space can qualify; a landlord cannot.

    UseSBA statusRule
    Apartment buildings and mobile home parksNot eligibleSOP 50 10 8, Sec. A, Ch. 1, Para. E.3; 13 CFR 120.110(c)
    Mixed-use with an operating business occupying the required shareEligible13 CFR 120.131
    Resident owner or manager spaceEligible if essential, sized to need, ≤49%SOP 50 10 8, Sec. A, Ch. 3, Para. C.1
    Licensed assisted living, memory care, nursing and residential care with health servicesEligibleSOP 50 10 8, Para. E.3
    Independent living and senior apartments without licensed careNot eligibleSOP 50 10 8, Para. E.3 (unlicensed residential facilities)
    Hotels, motels, extended-stay, RV parks, campgrounds, marinasEligible if >50% of prior-year revenue is from stays of 30 days or less (start-ups by projection)SOP 50 10 8, Para. E.3
    Short-term rentalsTested under the transient rule; portfolios leased to third parties risk passive treatmentSOP 50 10 8
    Boarding and rooming housesNot eligible unless >50% of revenue is from stays of 30 days or lessSOP 50 10 8
    Student housingNot eligible (long-term residential leasing)13 CFR 120.110(c)
    Employer-owned workforce housingNot eligible as a standalone rental; allowed only as essential resident space within 49%SOP 50 10 8
    Build-to-rent single-familyNot eligible (real estate held for lease)13 CFR 120.130
    Source: SBA SOP 50 10 8 (citations; carry-forward wording in SOP 50 10 8.1 applies to loans numbered on or after October 1, 2026); 13 CFR 120.110(c), 120.130, 120.131. Compiled by the firm; verified October 26, 2026.

    SBA mixed-use occupancy test (13 CFR 120.131)

    Building type
    Occupied by the business (≥51%)54.2%PASS
    Leased (≤49%)45.8%PASS
    Apartment share of the building33.3%
    Maximum residential space leasable at this footprint4,380 sq ft
    Minimum business footprint required6,120 sq ft

    The same building that passes as an existing acquisition fails as new construction.

    Illustrative screening only. Rentable property is measured consistently with the SOP, and eligibility is confirmed by the lender and SBA.

    Exhibit 6

    The SBA record for residential lessors (NAICS 531110)

    SBA lenders recorded 332 loans under the residential-lessor code in sixteen years, less than 2 percent of the hotel count and only 2 since FY2024. The data confirm the rule rather than a lending channel.

    332

    loans disbursed, FY2010–FY2026

    $183.7M

    approved volume

    $553,000

    average loan

    95.8%

    7(a) share of loans

    4.3% vs 7.3%

    seasoned adverse resolution vs all industries

    MetricValueCohort or period
    Loans disbursed332 loansFY2010–FY2026
    Approved volume$183.7 millionFY2010–FY2026
    Average loan$553,000FY2010–FY2026
    7(a) share95.8% of loansFY2010–FY2026
    Approvals in FY2024 or later2 loansFY2024–FY2026
    Seasoned loans282 loansFY2010–FY2021 approvals
    Seasoned adverse resolution4.3% (all industries 7.3%)FY2010–FY2021 approvals
    SBA hotel loans, same period17,815 loans; residential-lessor count less than 2% of it (firm arithmetic)FY2010–FY2026

    The 332 loans in this data block are coded to NAICS 531110, residential-building lessors, and they are not a record of SBA apartment lending. That code also covers residential and retirement hotels, cottage rentals and on-site manufactured home rentals, and lenders assign it themselves. Read the 4.3% adverse-resolution rate against 7.3% for all industries as a property of this coding bucket, not as a benchmark for a new mixed-use file. A residential-lessor code on a new application is a classification question to resolve in the file before underwriting starts.

    Source: Firm analysis of SBA 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan-level data, FY2010–FY2026, as of March 31, 2026.

    SBA program limits and coverage

    ItemRuleSource
    7(a) maximum$5,000,000; aggregate guaranty $3,750,00013 CFR 120.151
    504 project maximumUp to $5.5 millionSBA lender page
    Combined 7(a) and 504Up to $5M in 7(a) plus $5M in 504 ($10M) when the 7(a) loan is approved first, for loans numbered on or after July 4, 2026SBA Policy Notice 5000-879058; SBA News Release 26-52 (May 18, 2026)
    7(a) change of ownership (SOP 50 10 8.1, Appendix 15)1.25x for Initial Acquisitions, Owner Buyouts and ESOPs; 1.15x for Business Expansions; measured on the last fiscal year or a two-year average; projections excluded. 10% injection non-waivable for Initial Acquisitions only. Lender-ordered QoE at a purchase price of $3M or more.Womble Bond Dickinson; FunderIntel (2026)
    504 coverage1.15:1 minimum (EBITDA over combined post-504 debt service), per CDC summaries of SOP 50 10 8.1CDC summaries of SOP 50 10 8.1 (October 2026)
    Feasibility studyNot required by rule; SBA may require one under 13 CFR 120.160(b), and lenders and CDCs commonly order one for start-ups and new construction13 CFR 120.160(b)

    Test coverage with the DSCR calculator and read the DSCR guide for SBA loans, SBA 504 feasibility study and SBA 7(a) feasibility study pages.

    Opportunity Zones

    P.L. 119-21 made the Opportunity Zone incentive permanent. Reports describe rolling ten-year designations beginning January 1, 2027 and enhanced rural incentives; the study confirms designation status for the subject tract at the time of the engagement.

    What a multifamily feasibility study consultant analyzes

    An apartment feasibility study is built in the order a credit officer reads it: rents, demand, absorption, unit mix, expenses, refinance, value and regulation.

    Rent comparable analysis

    We construct rent comps from multiple sources and cross-reference the results. CoStar provides property-level rent and occupancy data for institutional-quality properties. Listing platforms such as Zillow provide broader coverage of smaller properties, and HUD Fair Market Rents and state housing agency rent limits anchor any rent-restricted units. Apartments.com and direct competitor websites provide current asking rents. For workforce housing in secondary markets where database coverage is thin, we supplement with direct phone surveys and on-site visits to competing properties.

    The comp set typically includes 5 to 10 properties that match the subject on key dimensions: unit count (within 25% to 50% of the subject), age and condition, unit mix, amenity level, and submarket location. Including a 300-unit Class A luxury complex in the comp set for a 40-unit workforce housing project produces meaningless benchmarks.

    We analyze rents on both a per-unit and per-square-foot basis. A 900 sq ft two-bedroom renting for $1,400 per month ($1.56 per sq ft) is a different value proposition than a 1,200 sq ft two-bedroom at the same $1,400 ($1.17 per sq ft). Tenants respond to total rent, but lenders evaluate per-square-foot efficiency.

    Demand: income-qualified renter households

    Demand begins with renter households in the primary market area that qualify by income, household size and, where relevant, age, adjusted for tenure and turnover. The study states the capture rate for the subject and the penetration rate for the subject plus all comparable existing and pipeline units, and compares both with the allocating agency’s thresholds where one applies. See the market analysis methodology.

    Absorption and lease-up

    Firm planning ranges for lease-up

    Project typeAbsorption rateTime to stabilizationDSCR implication
    New construction (strong market)8 to 15 units per month6 to 12 monthsDSCR may be below 1.0x for the first 3 to 6 months; reaches target by month 9 to 12
    New construction (moderate market)4 to 8 units per month12 to 18 monthsExtended sub-breakeven period; borrower needs reserves for 6 to 12 months of negative cash flow
    New construction (soft market)2 to 4 units per month18 to 30 monthsHigh risk; DSCR may not reach the lender’s minimum within its underwriting horizon
    Acquisition of stabilized propertyN/A (already leased)ImmediateDSCR calculated from in-place rents with adjustments for market repositioning
    Value-add renovationRe-lease at 3 to 8 units per month post-renovation6 to 12 months after completionTemporary vacancy during renovation; phased approach reduces cash flow disruption

    No published national lease-up standard exists. Each study replaces these ranges with the absorption recorded by recently completed comparable projects in the subject’s market.

    We derive the absorption rate from the submarket’s historical absorption of comparable new supply, the current vacancy rate in the comp set, and the subject’s competitive positioning. National context as of mid-2026: CBRE’s Q2 2026 multifamily figures put vacancy at 4.3%, net absorption at 167,000 units and completions at 77,700 units, down 14% from a year earlier, with average rent of $2,257, up 0.5% year over year (CBRE’s press release gives absorption as 167,500; other providers report different levels on different bases; see Exhibit 7). CBRE’s Midyear Review 2026 forecasts 1.4% rent growth and 4.9% vacancy for the year. A projection that grows apartment rent faster than that needs a sourced local reason.

    Unit mix

    Firm planning ranges for unit mix

    Unit typeShare of mixAverage sq ftRelative rent per sq ftTarget demographicAbsorption speed
    Studio5% to 15%400–550HighestYoung professionals, studentsFast in urban; slow in suburban
    1 BR / 1 BA30% to 45%600–800HighSingles, young couples, downsizersFastest overall absorption
    2 BR / 1–2 BA30% to 40%850–1,100ModerateCouples, roommates, small familiesStrong and consistent
    3 BR / 2 BA5% to 15%1,100–1,400LowestFamilies, rent-by-choice householdsSlower; narrower tenant pool

    The study supports the proposed mix from the demand analysis by household size, models revenue under the proposed mix and tests alternative configurations to identify whether a different allocation would produce a stronger DSCR.

    Operating expense benchmarking

    NAA’s operating benchmarks are now published through Income/Expense IQ, with IREM and BOMA. The 2024 report covered 4,666 conventional properties with 1,089,259 units in 109 metropolitan markets, and its same-store panel put total operating expenses at $8,657 per unit, up 2.2% from 2023. IREM’s full-sample national summary for 2024 puts total operating expenses at $7,981 per unit; the same-store panel and the full sample are not interchangeable. Insurance is the line that moves most: Trepp found multifamily property insurance up 58% over five years, even though median growth slowed to 2.7% in 2025.

    Firm planning ranges by expense line

    Expense categoryRange (% of gross revenue)Key variables
    Property management5% to 10%Self-managed (lower) vs third-party (higher); economies of scale above 100 units
    Payroll (on-site staff)8% to 15%Unit count, amenity level, local wage rates
    Maintenance and repairs5% to 10%Property age, climate, construction quality, deferred maintenance
    Utilities (owner-paid)4% to 8%Submetered vs master-metered, climate zone, energy efficiency
    Property taxes8% to 15%Jurisdiction, assessment methodology, abatement programs
    Insurance2% to 5%Location, construction type, claims history
    Marketing and leasing1% to 3%Market vacancy, turnover, competitive intensity
    Administrative and legal1% to 3%Eviction costs, compliance, accounting, technology
    Capital reserves (replacement)2% to 4%Property age, remaining useful life of major systems, lender requirements
    Total operating expense ratio38% to 55%Newer and larger = lower ratio; older and smaller = higher ratio

    The study computes the ratio from Income/Expense IQ data for the subject’s metro and product, the seller’s trailing twelve months, the current tax bill and an insurance quote. National I/E IQ lines are in Exhibit 10; see also financial projections and DSCR methodology.

    Refinance and debt-cost test

    At a 10-year Treasury near 4.6 percent and apartment cap rates of 5.4 to 5.8 percent, the spread is roughly 80 to 120 basis points, too thin for positive leverage on most agency debt. About 17 percent of the $5.0 trillion of outstanding commercial mortgages, $875 billion, matures in 2026, including about 13 percent of multifamily balances (MBA, February 2026). The study tests coverage at today’s rates and at refinance, not only at stabilization. See the SBA cost of capital index.

    Cap rate analysis

    Cap rate analysis provides a market-derived check on value relative to the purchase price or construction cost, and it informs the exit valuation. CBRE’s H1 2026 U.S. Cap Rate Survey found cap rates essentially flat in the first half of the year, with infill multifamily the most bearish property subtype. MSCI data compiled by RealPage put the Q2 2026 average apartment cap rate at 5.79 percent, an eleven-year high, and the trailing top-150-market series at 5.4 percent. Garden assets traded at $164,777 per unit, against $288,335 for mid- and high-rise, about 75 percent more. Survey ranges are professional estimates, not closed sales, so the study relies on closed submarket transactions first. Test figures with the cap rate calculator.

    Rent regulation

    Rent regulation caps the revenue model; see Exhibit 12. Washington and Oregon set 2027 caps at their 10 percent ceilings, California’s cap is 8.8 percent in the San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward region (including Contra Costa) through July 31, 2027, and New York City froze stabilized rents for leases starting October 1, 2026 through September 30, 2027.

    2026 multifamily market evidence

    Every figure carries its provider, measurement basis and period. The firm updates this section when a primary release changes the answer. Together these exhibits form the national context of every multifamily market study the firm issues, sourced under our data methodology and benchmarked against SBA loan default rates by industry and loss severity by property type.

    Exhibit 7

    Which vacancy number? Four providers, four answers

    Every provider shows the same direction, improvement in 2026, but their levels are not interchangeable. A study uses one provider per series, states its basis and never splices series.

    ProviderUniverseVacancy or occupancyRent and growthBasisDate
    CBRE69 markets4.3% vacancy (Q2 2026)$2,257, +0.5% YoYAverage rentJuly 29, 2026
    RealPageConventional professionally managed95.4% occupancy (Q3 2026)$1,915, +0.9% YoYSame-store effective rent, net of concessionsOctober 6, 2026
    Yardi Matrix50+ units, 140 markets94.3% stabilized; 93.9% total incl. lease-up (August 2026)$1,775, +0.7% YoY (September)Advertised rentOctober 2026
    Cushman & WakefieldAll properties incl. lease-up8.6% vacancy (Q3 2026)$1,950, +2.3% YoYAsking rentOctober 2026
    Census HVSAll rental housing7.3% rental vacancy (Q2 2026)—Household surveyJuly 28, 2026

    RealPage reports 22.7 percent of units offering concessions in Q3 2026, at an average 7.5 percent discount. That is roughly four weeks free on a twelve-month lease (firm arithmetic).

    Source: CBRE (July 29, 2026); RealPage (October 6, 2026); Yardi Matrix (October 2026); Cushman & Wakefield (October 2026); Census HVS (July 28, 2026).

    Exhibit 8

    The supply turn

    Completions have fallen almost by half from the 2024 peak, and 2026 starts are a quarter below 2025, so supply relief is real and front-loaded into 2027. The Sun Belt metros that built most are still cutting rents.

    IndicatorValueSource
    Completion peakNearly 588,000 units, annual, late 2024RealPage
    Completions, year to Q3 2026Nearly 318,000, about 46% below peakRealPage, October 6, 2026
    Absorption, year to Q3 2026About 304,800 units; demand-supply gap 13,000, narrowest since late 2015RealPage
    Census 5+ starts349,000 SAAR, −25.9% YoY (September 2026)Census NRC, October 20, 2026
    Census 5+ completions / under construction / permits339,000 SAAR / 677,000 (−3.1% YoY) / 503,000 SAAR (+1.0% YoY)Census NRC, October 20, 2026
    Forward deliveriesAbout 312,000–320,000 over the next four quartersRealPage 2Q26 and 3Q26 outlooks
    2026 forecastsCBRE: rent +1.4%, vacancy 4.9%. CoStar: vacancy 8.2% at end-2026, Q4 rent +1.9%. RealPage: +2.4% effective rent, Q4 2026–Q3 2027 (as reported).CBRE (August 4, 2026); CoStar (August 12, 2026); RealPage (October 2026)
    Metro splitSan Francisco +14.3% (RealPage, Q3) vs Austin −2.5%, Phoenix −2.1%, Houston −2.0%, Denver −1.6% (Yardi Matrix, September 2026)RealPage; Yardi Matrix
    Source: RealPage (2Q26 and 3Q26 outlooks; October 6, 2026); Census NRC (October 20, 2026); CBRE (August 4, 2026); CoStar (August 12, 2026); Yardi Matrix (September 2026).

    Exhibit 9

    The cost side is moving faster than rents

    Construction costs are rising 4 to 10 percent a year while rents rise 0.5 to 2.3 percent. New-construction feasibility now turns on the budget as much as on demand.

    IndicatorValueSource
    RLB national construction cost index+4.45% YoY, the largest quarterly rise in two yearsRLB Q3 2026 (July 2026 data)
    Inputs to residential construction+10.3% YoY (September 2026); softwood plywood +15.9%; building materials ex-energy +5.5%NAHB analysis of BLS PPI, October 15, 2026
    TariffsSteel and aluminum 50% from June 4, 2025 (Proclamation 10947); Canadian lumber duties about 35% plus 10% Section 232White House; NAHB
    Labor47% of builders report trade-labor shortages (September 2026 HMI); 33% of contractors affected by immigration enforcementNAHB, October 14, 2026; AGC–Sage, January 8, 2026
    Multifamily hard cost by metro, $/sf of gross floor area (garden to high-rise)Dallas 195–285; Austin 190–285; Phoenix 205–305; Nashville 220–385; Charlotte 220–375; Denver 225–415; Chicago 235–505; New York 260–510; Seattle 295–505; San Francisco 420–700RLB Q3 2026
    Source: RLB Q3 2026 (July 2026 data); NAHB (October 14 and 15, 2026); White House Proclamation 10947; AGC–Sage (January 8, 2026).

    Exhibit 10

    Operating expenses and insurance

    Expenses still outgrow revenue: median 2025 NOI rose 1.8 percent against 3.7 percent expense growth. A study states which I/E IQ sample it benchmarks against, because the same-store and full-sample totals differ by $676 per unit.

    ItemValueSource
    Total operating expenses, same-store$8,657 per unit, +2.2% vs 2023 (4,666 properties, 1,089,259 units, 109 metros)Income/Expense IQ 2024 data (NAA, IREM, BOMA; August 2025)
    Total operating expenses, full sample$7,981 per unitIREM I/E IQ National Summary 2024
    Administrative and payroll$2,323 per unit, +3.8%NAA
    Taxes and insurance$2,998 per unit, +2.65%NAA (secondary summary)
    Utilities$1,304 per unit, −3.2%NAA (secondary summary)
    Repairs and maintenance$1,098 per unit, +3.7%NAA (secondary summary)
    Insurance+58% over five years; median +2.7% in 2025 (+10.9% in 2024); Florida median −6.2% in 2025; Miami +101.9% over five yearsTrepp (2026)
    2025 operating resultsMedian opex +3.7%; median NOI +1.8%Trepp
    NYC rent-stabilized cost index+5.3% (2026)NYC Rent Guidelines Board
    Source: NAA, IREM and BOMA, Income/Expense IQ 2024 data (August 2025); IREM I/E IQ National Summary 2024; Trepp (2026); NYC Rent Guidelines Board (2026).

    Exhibit 11

    Where multifamily credit stress sits, by channel

    Multifamily CMBS delinquency now exceeds the CMBS average, while agency and bank books remain near or below 1 percent. Stress sits where floating-rate and maturing debt sit, so every study tests lease-up and refinance, not only stabilization.

    ChannelMeasureRatePeriodSource
    CMBS (multifamily)30+ day delinquency8.04% (6.94% in January)September 2026Trepp
    CMBS (all property types)30+ day delinquency8.02%September 2026Trepp
    CMBS multifamily special servicingSpecial servicing rate8.54%September 2026Trepp
    CRE CLO (multifamily)Delinquency3.88% on $41.35 billionSeptember 2026Trepp
    Banks (multifamily)Noncurrent rate1.10%Q2 2026FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile
    Freddie Mac (multifamily)Delinquency0.64% (0.48% in August 2025)August 2026Freddie Mac Monthly Volume Summary
    Fannie Mae (multifamily)Serious delinquency0.57%August 2026Fannie Mae

    Definitions differ by channel (30-day, 60-day and noncurrent measures), so rates are compared by order of magnitude, not point for point. For SBA-wide default patterns see the SBA Feasibility Risk Meter.

    Source: Trepp (September 2026); FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile (Q2 2026); Freddie Mac Monthly Volume Summary (August 2026); Fannie Mae (August 2026).

    Exhibit 12

    Rent regulation caps, 2026–2027

    Three West Coast states now cap annual increases at or near 10 percent, and New York City froze stabilized rents for two years. A projection that grows rent faster than the controlling cap is wrong by statute, not by judgment.

    JurisdictionCapValid forNew-construction exemptionSource
    Washington10% (formula produced 11.53%; 2026 cap was 9.683%)Calendar 2027Reported 12 yearsWA Commerce, July 15, 2026
    Oregon10% (2026: 9.5%); 6% for manufactured-home facilities over 30 spacesCalendar 2027First certificate of occupancy less than 15 years before noticeOregon DAS, September 28, 2026
    California AB 1482Lesser of 5% + regional CPI or 10%: SF–Oakland–Hayward (incl. Contra Costa) 8.8%; LA–Orange 8.7%; San Diego 8.2%; Riverside–San Bernardino 8.1%; other counties 8.6%August 1, 2026 – July 31, 202715-year rollingSecondary legal sources (2026)
    New York City (rent-stabilized, about 1 million units)0% one-year and 0% two-year leases, the first two-year freezeLeases starting October 1, 2026 – September 30, 2027Stabilization applies to pre-1974 buildings of 6+ units and to tax-benefit buildingsNYC RGB Order #58, June 25, 2026
    Cite this

    SBA Feasibility Study LLC, U.S. rent regulation caps, 2026–2027. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

    Source: WA Commerce (July 15, 2026); Oregon DAS (September 28, 2026); secondary legal sources on California AB 1482 (2026); NYC RGB Order #58 (June 25, 2026). Compiled by the firm; verified October 26, 2026.

    Exhibit 13

    Affordability and program rents

    Renter cost burden is at a record while program rents rise only 2 percent. Affordable and workforce projects are capped by program rents, not by market demand.

    ItemValueSource
    Cost-burdened renter households22.7 million (49%), including 12.1 million severely burdened (2024)Harvard JCHS, State of the Nation’s Housing 2026 (June 17, 2026)
    Units renting under $1,000 (real)Down by more than 7 million, 2014–2024Harvard JCHS
    FY2027 Fair Market RentsEffective October 1, 2026; weighted average +2.0% (non-metro +4.13%, metro +1.66%); national non-metro two-bedroom floor $1,014HUD, 91 FR 56156 (September 1, 2026); Novogradac
    Homeownership rate65.0%Census HVS, Q2 2026
    Source: Harvard JCHS, State of the Nation’s Housing 2026 (June 17, 2026); HUD, 91 FR 56156 (September 1, 2026); Novogradac; Census HVS (Q2 2026).

    Multifamily feasibility study vs market study vs appraisal

    The three documents answer different questions, as our comparison of a feasibility study vs appraisal vs market study explains. Ground-up projects add new construction feasibility and environmental due diligence questions, and expense assumptions follow our operating expense rationalization standard.

    Multifamily market studyFeasibility studyAppraisal
    Demand, comparables, capture and absorption; program-mandated for HUD, LIHTC and USDA.The market study plus budget, financing, pro forma, coverage through lease-up and refinance, and a determination.USPAP value opinion; for HUD, rents are compared with the market analyst’s independent conclusion.

    The market study proves the units will lease at the projected rents; the feasibility study proves the capital structure survives the lease-up; the appraisal states value. Programs that require all three expect them to reconcile.

    Related: feasibility study vs business plan and the report walkthrough.

    Engaging the firm: process, fee and timeline

    1. 1. Scoping call

      A 15-minute call; a written proposal with a firm fixed fee follows within one business day.

    2. 2. Data request

      A structured data request within one to two business days of the engagement letter.

    3. 3. Delivery and review

      A mid-point findings review on substantial engagements, delivery, and support through lender or agency review.

    The firm’s multifamily fee runs $4,900 to $18,000, fixed before work begins. The fee does not depend on the conclusion, the award or the closing. Delivery runs 10 to 15 business days from a complete data response. For pricing across property types, see the cost and timeline guide.

    Data request checklist

    Request Your Free Feasibility Study Consultation

    Multifamily feasibility study FAQ

    A multifamily feasibility study consultant tests, independently of the sponsor, whether an apartment project can lease, hold and price its units well enough to support the proposed debt and equity. The study names the capital source and its standard, defines the primary market area, develops rents from comparables, measures income-qualified renter demand with capture and penetration rates, inventories supply and pipeline, estimates lease-up and reports coverage through lease-up and at refinance. It closes with a determination addressed to the lender or agency.

    No. SBA’s SOP states that “Apartment buildings and mobile home parks are not eligible” (SOP 50 10 8, Section A, Chapter 1, Paragraph E.3), under the passive-business rule at 13 CFR 120.110(c). SBA can finance a mixed-use building where an eligible operating business occupies at least 51 percent of an existing building or 60 percent of new construction, with the apartments counted as leased space.

    A market study is a rule for HUD 221(d)(4), LIHTC and USDA rural rental housing. For Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, bank, life-company and debt-fund loans it is customary and set by credit policy; for an SBA mixed-use building it is discretionary under 13 CFR 120.160(b), and lenders and CDCs commonly order one for start-ups and new construction.

    A third-party market study under MAP Guide Chapter 7, Section 7.5. The analyst develops rents independently, and HUD compares them with the appraiser’s. For new construction, HUD’s appraisal and market analysis staff (EMAD) review the study. It remains valid for 120 days from pre-application and 180 days from firm commitment. A February 2026 draft Mortgagee Letter proposes changes to dating and EMAD review.

    IRC §42(m)(1)(A)(iii) requires a market study for every tax credit allocation, prepared by a disinterested third party under the state’s QAP. Capture rate is the share of qualified renter households the subject must capture; penetration rate is the share all comparable existing and proposed units must capture (NCHMA). Thresholds vary by state: Texas applies 10 percent under 10 TAC §11.303.

    Under 91 FR 60930 (September 25, 2026), Option 3 loan-to-cost rose from 70 to 80 percent, and a pilot allows 1.11 DSCR for the first 200 loans closed from October 9, 2026 to September 25, 2028. Fees were revised from September 30, 2026, with Opportunity Zone projects paying 60 bp initial and 25 bp annual.

    P.L. 119-21 permanently increased 9 percent allocations by 12 percent from 2026 and lowered the 4 percent bond test from 50 to 25 percent for buildings placed in service after December 31, 2025. The 2026 per-state ceiling is the greater of $3.416 per resident or $3,953,600 (IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32).

    Apply seven tests: the program standard is named in the engagement letter; the analyst meets the program’s preparer rules; rents are built from adjusted comparables; demand is measured as qualified renter households with capture and penetration; supply and lease-up come from local evidence; coverage is shown through lease-up and at refinance; and the consultant’s record includes findings of not feasible or feasible only with conditions.

    The market study proves the units will lease at the projected rents; the feasibility study proves the capital structure survives the lease-up; the appraisal states value. Programs that require all three expect them to reconcile.

    The firm’s multifamily fee runs $4,900 to $18,000, fixed in a written proposal within one business day before work begins. The fee does not depend on the conclusion, the award or the closing.

    Ten to 15 business days from a complete data response. The firm issues a structured data request within one to two business days of the engagement letter.

    Yes, if your business occupies at least 51% of the rentable property in an existing building, or 60% in new construction. The apartments count as leased space, so your business’s footprint must exceed the apartments and any other leased space combined.

    Only where the nature of the business requires a resident owner or manager. The residential space must be essential to the business, sized to its needs and no more than 49% of the total property.

    Up to $5 million through 7(a) and up to $5 million through 504, $10 million combined, when the 7(a) loan is approved first, for loans numbered on or after July 4, 2026 (SBA Policy Notice 5000-879058; SBA News Release 26-52, May 18, 2026). The 504 per-project maximum is up to $5.5 million.

    Every provider shows improvement in 2026, but their levels are not interchangeable: CBRE, RealPage, Yardi Matrix, Cushman & Wakefield and the Census measure different universes on different bases. A study uses one provider per series, states its basis and never splices series.

    No national standard exists; the study uses lease-up comparables, capture and penetration rates and the market’s record of adding and filling units.

    Income/Expense IQ, published by NAA with IREM and BOMA, is the benchmark. Its 2024 same-store panel puts total operating expenses at $8,657 per unit; IREM’s full-sample summary puts them at $7,981. The study states which sample it uses and reconciles it with the seller’s trailing twelve months, the tax bill and an insurance quote.

    Yes. Washington and Oregon cap 2027 increases at 10 percent, California’s AB 1482 cap is 8.1 to 8.8 percent by region through July 31, 2027, and New York City froze stabilized rents for leases starting October 1, 2026 to September 30, 2027. A projection that grows rent faster than the controlling cap is wrong by statute.

    Licensed assisted living, memory care, nursing and residential care with health services are eligible. Independent living and senior apartments without licensed care are not, because they are residential leasing.

    Yes, when the evidence requires it. The determination is feasible, feasible subject to stated conditions, or not feasible as proposed. Conditions can include a revised unit mix, rents at the program limit, a lower loan amount or an interest reserve sized to lease-up. The fee is the same whatever the conclusion.

    The firm’s analysis of SBA FOIA data, FY2010 to FY2026, finds 332 loans coded to NAICS 531110 totalling $183.7 million, less than 2 percent of the 17,815 SBA hotel loans over the same period, and only 2 approvals since FY2024. Seasoned loans reached adverse resolution at 4.3 percent against 7.3 percent for all industries. The code also covers non-apartment uses.

    More answers: SBA feasibility study FAQ and the glossary.

    Work with the firm’s multifamily feasibility study consultants

    Studies are signed by David Jones, MAI, CCIM. Every multifamily project we underwrite follows the same lender ready process: independent market analysis, site and technical review, and financial projections tested against SBA SOP 50 10 8.1. Our SBA feasibility study consultants guide explains scope, timing, deliverables, and what lenders and CDCs expect in the report.

    How this page is verified

    Program rules are checked against 13 CFR Part 120, SBA SOP 50 10 8 and 8.1, HUD Mortgagee Letters and the MAP Guide, IRC §42 and state QAPs, 7 CFR Parts 3560, 3565 and 5001, and FHFA releases. Every market figure names its provider, basis and date. Last verified October 26, 2026.

    Sources

    Changelog

    DateChange
    October 26, 2026Page rebuilt as the firm’s multifamily service page across every capital source. Added the capital-source study matrix; 2025–2026 HUD, LIHTC and USDA program rules; the SBA residential eligibility map and mixed-use occupancy test; the capture-rate calculator; and provider-basis, supply, cost, expense, credit-stress, rent-regulation and affordability exhibits. Corrected the SBA combined-limit, acquisition-coverage and 504 coverage statements. Removed an unsupported claim about NAA survey history. Relabelled unsupported ranges as firm planning ranges.

    Multifamily and mixed-use feasibility resources

    Our SBA feasibility study consultants prepare multifamily, mixed-use and residential development studies for lenders, CDCs and sponsors. See pricing, methodology or request a fixed fee quote.